Interactions between Regulatory and Antitrust Policies in a Liberalized Postal Sector
نویسنده
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Market Liberalization, Regulatory Uncertainty, and Firm Investment
Motivated by the German postal market, this paper analyzes the effects of regulatory uncertainty about labor costs for investment into a liberalized market. We distinguish between the external investment margin (market entry) and the internal investment margin (technology) and establish that regulatory uncertainty affects these margins differently, encouraging market entry but discouraging inve...
متن کاملAccess Pricing and Entry in the Postal Sector
In a fully liberalized postal market, two business models will be possible for a new postal operator: (1) access: where the firm performs the upstream operations and uses the incumbent’s network for final delivery and (2) bypass where the competing firm controls the entire supply chain and delivers mails with its own network. The choice between access and bypass depends on the entrant’s deliver...
متن کاملPostal Service Pricing Policies after PAEA
The Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act of 2006 (PAEA) fundamentally altered the U.S. Postal Service by introducing enhanced pricing flexibility, profit incentives, and potential antitrust liability. PAEA also mandated a change from breakeven, cost-of-service regulation where revenues must equal costs over time to price cap regulation. The Postal Service can now introduce new or modify ex...
متن کاملEconomic liberalization, capital mobility and informal wage in a small open economy : A theoretical analysis
Empirical evidence suggests that the size of the informal sector in the developing countries has increased considerably during the liberalized economic regime. The present paper purports to analyze the consequences of economic reforms on the wellbeing of the informal sector workforce using a three-sector general equilibrium model with two informal sectors. The theoretical analysis finds that di...
متن کاملContesting anticompetitive actions taken in the name of the state: state action immunity and health care markets.
The so-called state action doctrine is a judicially created formula for resolving conflicts between federal antitrust policy and state policies that seem to authorize conduct that antitrust law would prohibit. Against the background of recent commentaries by the federal antitrust agencies, this article reviews the doctrine and discusses its application in the health care sector, focusing on the...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2008